VSAO/ASMAC Stiftung für Selbständigerwerbende
svsao-stiftung.ch
- Industry
- Pension funds
- Headquarters
- Bern, Bern
- Type
- foundation
- Checked on
- 19 October 2026
Protection against forged senders: not protected
Points per criterion
- MX 0 / 10
- SPF 0 / 15
- DKIM 0 / 20
- DMARC 0 / 25
- DNSSEC 10 / 10
- Transport (MTA-STS/DANE) 0 / 15
- TLS-RPT 0 / 5
- Industry avg.: 45.1 ▼ 35.1
- Canton avg.: 53.1 ▼ 43.1
- Overall avg.: 53.5 ▼ 43.5
- Rank 55 of 59 in the industry
Findings
-
✕No SPF record
Without SPF there is no list of servers allowed to send for the domain, so receivers cannot detect forged senders via SPF.
-
✕No DMARC record
Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.
-
!No MX record
Without MX, senders fall back to the domain's A record. For an active mail domain this is a misconfiguration.
-
!No DKIM key found
No key was found under more than 100 common selectors. A custom selector is possible, but without DKIM there is no cryptographic sender check.
-
!No MTA-STS
Without MTA-STS (or DANE) inbound encryption is not enforced; an attacker on the path can downgrade to plain text.
-
!No TLS reporting (TLS-RPT)
Without TLS-RPT the organisation does not learn when senders fail to deliver encrypted.
Who runs the mail?
- Mailbox provider
- Kein Mailempfang
- Provider jurisdiction
- no inbound
- Detection confidence
- 0 / 100
MX servers
| Pref | Host | IP | Network | Country | TLSA |
|---|
SPF
No SPF record
DMARC
Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.
DKIM
No DKIM key found
Checked: 100 common selectors. Keys under custom selectors remain invisible.
Transport encryption
- MTA-STS
- missing
- DANE
- missing
- DNSSEC
- active
- TLS-RPT
- missing
- BIMI
- missing
History
- Score 10 · DMARC -
Raw data
