Gemeinde Erlinsbach

Points per criterion

• MX 10 / 10
• SPF 15 / 15
• DKIM 0 / 20
• DMARC 0 / 25
• DNSSEC 0 / 10
• Transport (MTA-STS/DANE) 0 / 15
• TLS-RPT 0 / 5

• Industry avg.: 50.9 ▼ 25.9
• Canton avg.: 57.3 ▼ 32.3
• Overall avg.: 53.5 ▼ 28.5
• Rank 1870 of 2077 in the industry

Findings

• ✕No DMARC record

  Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.

• !No DKIM key found

  No key was found under more than 100 common selectors. A custom selector is possible, but without DKIM there is no cryptographic sender check.

• !DNSSEC not enabled

  Without DNSSEC, DNS answers can be forged in transit. DANE requires DNSSEC.

• !No MTA-STS

  Without MTA-STS (or DANE) inbound encryption is not enforced; an attacker on the path can downgrade to plain text.

• !No TLS reporting (TLS-RPT)

  Without TLS-RPT the organisation does not learn when senders fail to deliver encrypted.

Check live in the Mail DNS Check →

Who runs the mail?

Mailbox provider

Self-hosted / other

Provider jurisdiction

Switzerland · MX: CH

Detection confidence

85 / 100

MX servers

SPF

v=spf1 include:_spf.sui-inter.net +mx +a -all

all

-all

DNS lookups

3 / 10

Includes

_spf.sui-inter.net

DMARC

Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.

DKIM

No DKIM key found

Checked: 100 common selectors. Keys under custom selectors remain invisible.

Transport encryption

MTA-STS

missing

DANE

missing

DNSSEC

missing

TLS-RPT

missing

BIMI

missing

History

• 19 October 2026 Score 25 · DMARC -

All changes of this organisation in the change log →

More from this industry

• Gemeinde Uzwil 98
• Stadt St. Gallen 98
• Commune de Courchapoix 92
• Gemeinde Bellwald 92
• Gemeinde Brig-Glis 92
• Gemeinde Erlach 92
• Gemeinde Unterbäch 92
• Ville de Monthey 91