Comune di Cugnasco-Gerra

Points per criterion

• MX 10 / 10
• SPF 13 / 15
• DKIM 0 / 20
• DMARC 0 / 25
• DNSSEC 0 / 10
• Transport (MTA-STS/DANE) 0 / 15
• TLS-RPT 0 / 5

• Industry avg.: 50.9 ▼ 27.9
• Canton avg.: 43.3 ▼ 20.3
• Overall avg.: 53.5 ▼ 30.5
• Rank 2029 of 2077 in the industry

Findings

• ✕No DMARC record

  Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.

• !No DKIM key found

  No key was found under more than 100 common selectors. A custom selector is possible, but without DKIM there is no cryptographic sender check.

• !DNSSEC not enabled

  Without DNSSEC, DNS answers can be forged in transit. DANE requires DNSSEC.

• !No MTA-STS

  Without MTA-STS (or DANE) inbound encryption is not enforced; an attacker on the path can downgrade to plain text.

• !No TLS reporting (TLS-RPT)

  Without TLS-RPT the organisation does not learn when senders fail to deliver encrypted.

Check live in the Mail DNS Check →

Who runs the mail?

Mailbox provider

Self-hosted / other

Provider jurisdiction

Switzerland · MX: CH

Detection confidence

85 / 100

MX servers

SPF

v=spf1 a:lin16.assolo.net ip4:89.207.237.84 ip4:178.23.174.0/27 include:_asms4spf.assolo.net ~all

all

~all

DNS lookups

4 / 10

Includes

_asms4spf.assolo.net

IPv4

33 addresses authorised directly

DMARC

Without DMARC no receiver reliably rejects forged mail in the domain's name, and the organisation receives no abuse reports.

DKIM

No DKIM key found

Checked: 100 common selectors. Keys under custom selectors remain invisible.

Transport encryption

MTA-STS

missing

DANE

missing

DNSSEC

missing

TLS-RPT

missing

BIMI

missing

History

• 19 October 2026 Score 23 · DMARC -

All changes of this organisation in the change log →

More from this industry

• Gemeinde Uzwil 98
• Stadt St. Gallen 98
• Commune de Courchapoix 92
• Gemeinde Bellwald 92
• Gemeinde Brig-Glis 92
• Gemeinde Erlach 92
• Gemeinde Unterbäch 92
• Ville de Monthey 91